他们不使用crpg是因为bg3不是pc平台独占游戏当然也就不是纯粹的computer rpg，而且也不是classic rpg（别问classic是什么意思这又是一笔烂账），如果按定义的标准来分类这游戏还真就不是crpg。问题是很多公认的crpg也是不符合这个标准的，现在所谓的crpg本来就不局限于这个定义，这就是纯抠字眼，或者可以说，“严谨”，毕竟分类标准本身确实存在很大的问题
It has a lot of depth, but it's doing things most RPGs aren't able to do. The latter is a big reason for its perceived success. Every time we release a 'CRPG', we know that the 'CRPG' audience grows. The only reason — at least on the industry side — that people think this audience is 'small' is because there isn't a big enough pool of data to pull from. How well should BG3 do? Well, what other 'CRPG' with AAA production values are you going to look at to project from? It's a blessing, and a curse.
人根本就没有否定crpg的意思，说的成功原因也不是深度而是能做到其他rpg做不到的事情。真是无语了，虽然这个人说话一直挺蠢的，但是你也不能比他更蠢吧……